ARUNA RAO S K vs M/S SRI DURGA PERFUMARY WORKS Advocate - FEROZE NIZAM A — 296/2023
Case under U/o 21 Rule 11 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 14th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KABC010027772023
Filing Number
281/2023
Filing Date
30-Jan-2023
Registration No
296/2023
Registration Date
31-Jan-2023
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
4-Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUNA RAO S K
Adv. Karan Mandgi A
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S SRI DURGA PERFUMARY WORKS Advocate - FEROZE NIZAM A
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 296/2023 between Aruna Rao S K and M/S Sri Durga Perfumary Works was resolved at National Lok Adalath on 14.03.2026 through a joint settlement memo filed by both parties. The court approved the settlement terms as legally valid after both parties acknowledged the agreement, and the respondent paid Rs. 6,25,000 towards the execution petition amount, resulting in the petition being closed as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
A.D.R.
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2024
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2024
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Objection
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
13-Aug-2024
Notice
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
22-Jun-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Orders
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2024
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
16-Sep-2023
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2023
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2023
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
08-Feb-2023
Hearing
Cch25 III Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 296/2023
Case 296/2023 between Aruna Rao S K and M/S Sri Durga Perfumary Works was resolved at National Lok Adalath on 14.03.2026 through a joint settlement memo filed by both parties. The court approved the settlement terms as legally valid after both parties acknowledged the agreement, and the respondent paid Rs. 6,25,000 towards the execution petition amount, resulting in the petition being closed as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts