MANAPPURAM FINANCE LTD vs MADHU NARAYANAN — 66/2025

Case under 21 Rule 26 R/w Sec.151 of Cpc Section Order 21 Rule 10 & 11. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KABC010004042025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-01-2025

Filing Number

38/2025

Filing Date

07-01-2025

Registration No

66/2025

Registration Date

08-01-2025

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

2-CCH5 IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

21 Rule 26 R/w Sec.151 of Cpc Section Order 21 Rule 10 & 11

Petitioner(s)

MANAPPURAM FINANCE LTD

Adv. Anish Antony

Respondent(s)

MADHU NARAYANAN

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CCH5 IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

A.D.R.

27-02-2026

A.D.R.

11-12-2025

OBJECTION

26-09-2025

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: Manappuram Finance Ltd v. Madhu Narayanan (EX 66/2025) The Lokadalath dismissed the execution petition after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Madhu Narayanan (judgment debtor) paid Rs. 1,19,175 to Manappuram Finance Ltd (decree holder), who acknowledged receipt and confirmed no further claims. The court allowed the joint settlement memo and closed the case as the decree was fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Manappuram Finance Ltd v. Madhu Narayanan (EX 66/2025) The Lokadalath dismissed the execution petition after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Madhu Narayanan (judgment debtor) paid Rs. 1,19,175 to Manappuram Finance Ltd (decree holder), who acknowledged receipt and confirmed no further claims. The court allowed the joint settlement memo and closed the case as the decree was fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case