Ashish Gupta vs UNion Territory of JK through Chief SecretaryTo Goverment Civil SEcrteriart — 1378/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--Exparte Decree on 29th December 2025.

Case disposed

Original Suits (OS) - Original Suits

CNR: JKSG020024312023

Filing Number

3397/2023

Filing Date

20-Jun-2023

Registration No

1378/2023

Registration Date

20-Jun-2023

Court

Principal District Judge, Srinagar

Judge

13-Sub-Judge Srinagar

Decision Date

29-Dec-2025

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Exparte Decree

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashish Gupta

    Adv. Altaf Mehraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNion Territory of JK through Chief SecretaryTo Goverment Civil SEcrteriart

  2. 2.COMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVT.REVENUE DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.SECRETARY TO GOVT. CENTRAL BOARD OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

  4. 4.DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL BUREAU OF COMMUNICATION MINISTARY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

  5. 5.ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL BUREAU OF COMMUNICATION

  6. 6.DIRECTOR CENTRAL BUREAU OF COMMUNICATIN REGIONAL OFFICE

  7. 7.public at large

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Dec-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Sub Judge Court in Srinagar granted a declaration that four family members (Ashish Gupta, Anju Gupta, Mehak Gupta, and Harsh Gupta) are Muslims with Islamic names (Abdul Wahied, Shameem Akhter, Mehak Sheikh, and Hamza Sheikh respectively), and issued a mandatory injunction ordering government authorities to update official records to reflect their religious conversion and name changes, which they had practiced for 16 years since 2009. The court upheld their constitutional right under Article 25 to freely profess and practice religion, finding no factual or legal reason to deny relief where the conversion was genuine and uncontested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Dec-2025

    Disposed

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Documents

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    Orders__

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Orders__

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Defendants

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  10. 09-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Defendants

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  11. 29-Jul-2025

    Witness__

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    documents/issues

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  13. 02-May-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  14. 24-Mar-2025

    Preliminary Statement

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  15. 27-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  16. 04-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  17. 02-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  18. 28-Aug-2024

    Notice

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  19. 20-Jul-2024

    Notice

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  20. 29-May-2024

    Awaiting Defendants

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  21. 07-Mar-2024

    Awaited

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  22. 23-Dec-2023

    Awaited

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  23. 23-Nov-2023

    Notice

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  24. 22-Aug-2023

    Notice

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  25. 22-Jul-2023

    Notice

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  26. 15-Jul-2023

    Notice

    Sub-Judge Srinagar

  27. 20-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 20-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1378/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Sub Judge Court in Srinagar granted a declaration that four family members (Ashish Gupta, Anju Gupta, Mehak Gupta, and Harsh Gupta) are Muslims with Islamic names (Abdul Wahied, Shameem Akhter, Mehak Sheikh, and Hamza Sheikh respectively), and issued a mandatory injunction ordering government authorities to update official records to reflect their religious conversion and name changes, which they had practiced for 16 years since 2009. The court upheld their constitutional right under Article 25 to freely profess and practice religion, finding no factual or legal reason to deny relief where the conversion was genuine and uncontested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case