Rakesh Kumar Bari alias Rakesh Ram Bari vs State of Jharkhand — 1992/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,484. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

MISC. CRI. APPLICATION - MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION

CNR: JHRN030355872026

Filing Number

35563/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

1992/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Court

Chief judicial Magistrate

Judge

1-C.J.M

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

Chutia

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,484

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rakesh Kumar Bari alias Rakesh Ram Bari

    Adv. Bablu kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Jharkhand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The CJM Ranchi granted bail to Rakesh Kumar Bari, accused of manufacturing and selling counterfeit HP toner cartridges under BNS Section 318(4), Copyright Act, and Trade Mark Act. The court considered his clean criminal record, status as mere staff at the location, and period of detention, enlarging him on bail of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperating in investigations and not changing his mobile number without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.M

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    C.J.M

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1992/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The CJM Ranchi granted bail to Rakesh Kumar Bari, accused of manufacturing and selling counterfeit HP toner cartridges under BNS Section 318(4), Copyright Act, and Trade Mark Act. The court considered his clean criminal record, status as mere staff at the location, and period of detention, enlarging him on bail of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperating in investigations and not changing his mobile number without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case