The State of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI PIDIYABHAI MEDA — 3341/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY

CNR: GJVD240030462026

Filing Number

3341/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

3341/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

VADODARA RAILWAY COURT, VADODARA

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI PIDIYABHAI MEDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Vadodara Court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for a criminal offense and, considering mitigating circumstances including the accused's poverty, first-time offense, and family dependents, imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 200 fine or two days imprisonment instead of the statutory minimum punishment. The court applied established precedent permitting lighter sentences when compelling and justified reasons exist, prioritizing rehabilitation over strict sentencing guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3341/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Vadodara Court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for a criminal offense and, considering mitigating circumstances including the accused's poverty, first-time offense, and family dependents, imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 200 fine or two days imprisonment instead of the statutory minimum punishment. The court applied established precedent permitting lighter sentences when compelling and justified reasons exist, prioritizing rehabilitation over strict sentencing guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case