THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJITBHAI MALSINGBHAI PANDA Advocate - A Y MANSURI — 166/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 05th March 2026.

CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY

CNR: GJVD240001882026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

166/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

166/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

VADODARA RAILWAY COURT, VADODARA

Judge

1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)

Decision Date

05th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,116(B)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AJITBHAI MALSINGBHAI PANDA Advocate - A Y MANSURI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)

05-03-2026

Disposed

21-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

05-03-2026
ORDER

The Vadodara court convicted the accused under IPC Section 264 (adulteration of provisions) read with the Gujarat Food Safety Rules 2012, finding him guilty of selling provisions below the prescribed minimum quantity limit of 20 liters. Considering the accused's poor financial condition, family circumstances, and first-time offense, the court imposed a reduced sentence of a fine of Rs. 200 (in default, two days simple imprisonment) instead of the statutory minimum, citing adequate grounds for leniency and principles of criminal justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Vadodara court convicted the accused under IPC Section 264 (adulteration of provisions) read with the Gujarat Food Safety Rules 2012, finding him guilty of selling provisions below the prescribed minimum quantity limit of 20 liters. Considering the accused's poor financial condition, family circumstances, and first-time offense, the court imposed a reduced sentence of a fine of Rs. 200 (in default, two days simple imprisonment) instead of the statutory minimum, citing adequate grounds for leniency and principles of criminal justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

VADODARA RAILWAY COURT, VADODARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case