RPF POST ANAND vs DHARMESHKUMAR JAYENDRABHAI PATEL Advocate - M Y FODA — 64/2023
Case under Railways Act, 1989 Section 143,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th March 2026.
CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY
CNR: GJVD240000292023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
64/2023
Filing Date
26-08-2022
Registration No
64/2023
Registration Date
26-08-2022
Court
VADODARA RAILWAY COURT, VADODARA
Judge
1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RPF POST ANAND
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DHARMESHKUMAR JAYENDRABHAI PATEL Advocate - M Y FODA
MOHMMAD NAVSAD MOHMMAD ANVAR ANSARI(Permanently exempted)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 18-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 29-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 01-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Indian Court Judgment This Gujarat High Court judgment convicted two individuals under Railway Act 1989, Section 143 for operating an illegal railway ticket black market business. The court found that the accused, acting in concert over two years, systematically procured reserved accommodation tickets without authorization and sold them to passengers at inflated prices (₹200-300 commission per ticket), causing public inconvenience. While convicting the primary accused, the court granted probation under the Probation Act 1958 considering first-time offence circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Indian Court Judgment This Gujarat High Court judgment convicted two individuals under Railway Act 1989, Section 143 for operating an illegal railway ticket black market business. The court found that the accused, acting in concert over two years, systematically procured reserved accommodation tickets without authorization and sold them to passengers at inflated prices (₹200-300 commission per ticket), causing public inconvenience. While convicting the primary accused, the court granted probation under the Probation Act 1958 considering first-time offence circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts