SANJAYBHAI BHARATBHAI BARIYA vs LILESHKUMAR CHANDRAKANT VASAVA — 33/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164. Status: Applicants Evidence. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJVD220001812024
Filing Number
33/2024
Filing Date
13-Jun-2024
Registration No
33/2024
Registration Date
13-Jun-2024
Court
ADDL. COURT-DABHOI
Judge
2-5th Addl District Judge
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI BHARATBHAI BARIYA
Adv. K P PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.LILESHKUMAR CHANDRAKANT VASAVA
-
2.PRAKASHBHAI NARANBHAI PATANVADIYA
-
3.H.D.F.C. AGRO INSURANCE CO.
Adv. J I SHAH
Case History
-
18-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Applicants Evidence
5th Addl District Judge
-
19-May-2026
Applicants Evidence
5th Addl District Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
SUMMARY: In this Motor Vehicles Act Section 164 compensation claim (MACT Case 33/2024), the court ordered that Respondents 1 and 2's right to file a reply be barred due to non-compliance with procedural timelines, and the case shall proceed ex-parte against them. Respondent 3 (HDFC Agro Insurance) filed their power of attorney but no substantive reply; the case is adjourned for final hearing on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Aug-2025
Issues
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl District Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Written Statement/Reply
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-May-2025
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2025
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2024
SUMMARY: In this Motor Vehicles Act Section 164 compensation claim (MACT Case 33/2024), the court ordered that Respondents 1 and 2's right to file a reply be barred due to non-compliance with procedural timelines, and the case shall proceed ex-parte against them. Respondent 3 (HDFC Agro Insurance) filed their power of attorney but no substantive reply; the case is adjourned for final hearing on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts