SUKHADEVBHAI BUDHIYABHAI RATHODIYA vs HITESHBHAI CHANDRAKANTBHAI PARMAR POWER OF ATERNY MANAGER SHALIBHADARA FINANCE LTD. Advocate - S N KADIYA — 4/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Status: FINAL HEARING. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJVD220000872025
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
10-03-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
10-03-2025
Court
ADDL. COURT-DABHOI
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUKHADEVBHAI BUDHIYABHAI RATHODIYA
Adv. A H MAKRANI
Respondent(s)
HITESHBHAI CHANDRAKANTBHAI PARMAR POWER OF ATERNY MANAGER SHALIBHADARA FINANCE LTD. Advocate - S N KADIYA
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 03-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 19-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The appellate court withdrew the bail granted to appellant Sukhdevbhai Budhiyabhai Rathodiya in his criminal appeal against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The appellant failed to comply with the mandatory condition to deposit 20% of the cheque amount (₹1,08,489) within the prescribed 60-day period and stopped attending court proceedings. The court removed the sentence suspension, forfeited the bail and surety bonds, and directed the trial court to issue a warrant for the appellant's arrest to undergo the original sentence of one year simple imprisonment plus compensation payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The appellate court withdrew the bail granted to appellant Sukhdevbhai Budhiyabhai Rathodiya in his criminal appeal against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The appellant failed to comply with the mandatory condition to deposit 20% of the cheque amount (₹1,08,489) within the prescribed 60-day period and stopped attending court proceedings. The court removed the sentence suspension, forfeited the bail and surety bonds, and directed the trial court to issue a warrant for the appellant's arrest to undergo the original sentence of one year simple imprisonment plus compensation payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts