SUKHADEVBHAI BUDHIYABHAI RATHODIYA vs HITESHBHAI CHANDRAKANTBHAI PARMAR POWER OF ATERNY MANAGER SHALIBHADARA FINANCE LTD. Advocate - S N KADIYA — 4/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Status: FINAL HEARING. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJVD220000872025

FINAL HEARING

Next Hearing

12th March 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2025

Filing Date

10-03-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

10-03-2025

Court

ADDL. COURT-DABHOI

Judge

2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415,

Petitioner(s)

SUKHADEVBHAI BUDHIYABHAI RATHODIYA

Adv. A H MAKRANI

Respondent(s)

HITESHBHAI CHANDRAKANTBHAI PARMAR POWER OF ATERNY MANAGER SHALIBHADARA FINANCE LTD. Advocate - S N KADIYA

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

05-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

03-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

23-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

12-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

19-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

Interim Orders

07-07-2025
ORDER

Summary: The appellate court withdrew the bail granted to appellant Sukhdevbhai Budhiyabhai Rathodiya in his criminal appeal against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The appellant failed to comply with the mandatory condition to deposit 20% of the cheque amount (₹1,08,489) within the prescribed 60-day period and stopped attending court proceedings. The court removed the sentence suspension, forfeited the bail and surety bonds, and directed the trial court to issue a warrant for the appellant's arrest to undergo the original sentence of one year simple imprisonment plus compensation payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appellate court withdrew the bail granted to appellant Sukhdevbhai Budhiyabhai Rathodiya in his criminal appeal against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The appellant failed to comply with the mandatory condition to deposit 20% of the cheque amount (₹1,08,489) within the prescribed 60-day period and stopped attending court proceedings. The court removed the sentence suspension, forfeited the bail and surety bonds, and directed the trial court to issue a warrant for the appellant's arrest to undergo the original sentence of one year simple imprisonment plus compensation payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. COURT-DABHOI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case