BHARATBHAI NAGINBHAI PARMAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 1/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 351(2). Status: REPLY. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
SMRY - SUMMARY
CNR: GJVD220000842025
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2025
Filing Date
07-03-2025
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
07-03-2025
Court
ADDL. COURT-DABHOI
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHARATBHAI NAGINBHAI PARMAR
Adv. A A PARMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | REPLY | |
| 06-02-2026 | REPLY | |
| 09-01-2026 | REPLY | |
| 15-12-2025 | REPLY | |
| 21-11-2025 | REPLY |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court adjourned the case and issued a notice to the Investigating Officer (IO) to file a report explaining whether he examined the witness list submitted by the complainant during the FIR investigation. The IO must comply by the next hearing date of 09.01.2026, as the complainant objected to the B-Summary Report filed by the IO, contending that key witnesses were not examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court adjourned the case and issued a notice to the Investigating Officer (IO) to file a report explaining whether he examined the witness list submitted by the complainant during the FIR investigation. The IO must comply by the next hearing date of 09.01.2026, as the complainant objected to the B-Summary Report filed by the IO, contending that key witnesses were not examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts