RAJESHKUMAR SHANABHAI PARMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL — 115/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJVD200004222026
Filing Number
115/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
115/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL. COURT-SAVLI
Judge
2-9th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11197057260308
Police Station
WAGHODIA POLICE STATION - VADODARA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESHKUMAR SHANABHAI PARMAR
Adv. D K PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.M.A. 115/2026 The 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara granted regular bail to Rajeshkumar Shanabhai Parmar on March 25, 2026, in a Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act case. The court found that since the muddmal (contraband) was already recovered, no further investigation discovery was pending, and the offences were triable by a Magistrate, detention would amount to pre-trial conviction. The court also applied parity reasoning, as a co-accused had already been granted bail, and noted the applicant's fixed Vadodara residence minimized flight risk. Bail was granted on Rs. 15,000 personal bond with equivalent surety and ten stringent conditions including monthly police check-ins, passport surrender, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
9th Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 115/2026
Case Summary: Cr.M.A. 115/2026 The 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara granted regular bail to Rajeshkumar Shanabhai Parmar on March 25, 2026, in a Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act case. The court found that since the muddmal (contraband) was already recovered, no further investigation discovery was pending, and the offences were triable by a Magistrate, detention would amount to pre-trial conviction. The court also applied parity reasoning, as a co-accused had already been granted bail, and noted the applicant's fixed Vadodara residence minimized flight risk. Bail was granted on Rs. 15,000 personal bond with equivalent surety and ten stringent conditions including monthly police check-ins, passport surrender, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts