DEVA MUNNA GULABSINH NAYDU vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL — 87/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJVD200001992026

Filing Number

87/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-SAVLI

Judge

2-9th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVA MUNNA GULABSINH NAYDU

    Adv. S H RANA

  2. 2.KANNA RAJARAM TUTTINAYKAR

    Adv. S H RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Vadodara granted regular bail to two accused, Deva Munna Gulabsinh Naidu and Kanna Rajaram Tuttinaykar, in a case involving offences under Sections 303(2) and 54 of the BNS, finding that no further police custody was required and that concerns about flight risk could be managed through bail conditions. The court ordered their release on Rs.10,000 cash surety each with a personal bond of Rs.15,000 each and imposed stringent conditions including monthly police station appearances, passport surrender, and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    9th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Vadodara granted regular bail to two accused, Deva Munna Gulabsinh Naidu and Kanna Rajaram Tuttinaykar, in a case involving offences under Sections 303(2) and 54 of the BNS, finding that no further police custody was required and that concerns about flight risk could be managed through bail conditions. The court ordered their release on Rs.10,000 cash surety each with a personal bond of Rs.15,000 each and imposed stringent conditions including monthly police station appearances, passport surrender, and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case