DEVA MUNNA GULABSINH NAYDU vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL — 87/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJVD200001992026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
87/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
87/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
ADDL. COURT-SAVLI
Judge
2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVA MUNNA GULABSINH NAYDU
Adv. S H RANA
KANNA RAJARAM TUTTINAYKAR
Adv. S H RANA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Vadodara granted regular bail to two accused, Deva Munna Gulabsinh Naidu and Kanna Rajaram Tuttinaykar, in a case involving offences under Sections 303(2) and 54 of the BNS, finding that no further police custody was required and that concerns about flight risk could be managed through bail conditions. The court ordered their release on Rs.10,000 cash surety each with a personal bond of Rs.15,000 each and imposed stringent conditions including monthly police station appearances, passport surrender, and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Vadodara granted regular bail to two accused, Deva Munna Gulabsinh Naidu and Kanna Rajaram Tuttinaykar, in a case involving offences under Sections 303(2) and 54 of the BNS, finding that no further police custody was required and that concerns about flight risk could be managed through bail conditions. The court ordered their release on Rs.10,000 cash surety each with a personal bond of Rs.15,000 each and imposed stringent conditions including monthly police station appearances, passport surrender, and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts