CHHAGANBHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL — 85/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJVD200001972026

Filing Number

85/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

85/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-SAVLI

Judge

2-9th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHAGANBHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL

    Adv. R D GAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara rejected the regular bail application of Chhaganbhai Kanjibhai Patel (age 63) under Section 483 BNSS. The court found a prima facie case established: the accused fired an unlicensed weapon at a complainant and others who were searching for a missing minor on his farm, shooting from behind their vehicle and causing a bullet injury to the complainant's shoulder. The court determined that the investigation is at a preliminary stage and there exists a likelihood of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    9th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    9th Addl District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara rejected the regular bail application of Chhaganbhai Kanjibhai Patel (age 63) under Section 483 BNSS. The court found a prima facie case established: the accused fired an unlicensed weapon at a complainant and others who were searching for a missing minor on his farm, shooting from behind their vehicle and causing a bullet injury to the complainant's shoulder. The court determined that the investigation is at a preliminary stage and there exists a likelihood of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case