RAJUBHAI PARVATBHAI PARMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL — 84/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJVD200001962026

Filing Number

84/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

84/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-SAVLI

Judge

2-9th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJUBHAI PARVATBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. M M VANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara rejected Rajubhai Parvatbhai Parmar's bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS in a liquor prohibition case. The court found a strong prima facie case against the applicant, who was arrested during a raid as a driver in a vehicle carrying a huge quantity of IMFL, and noted that the investigation was at a preliminary stage with other co-accused still to be arrested, making it unsuitable for bail discretion at that juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    9th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    9th Addl District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 84/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara rejected Rajubhai Parvatbhai Parmar's bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS in a liquor prohibition case. The court found a strong prima facie case against the applicant, who was arrested during a raid as a driver in a vehicle carrying a huge quantity of IMFL, and noted that the investigation was at a preliminary stage with other co-accused still to be arrested, making it unsuitable for bail discretion at that juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case