MAHESHBHAI KHODABHAI SOLANKI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL — 83/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJVD200001952026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
83/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL. COURT-SAVLI
Judge
2-9th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 10-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESHBHAI KHODABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D C RATHOD
-
2.VISHAL MAHESHBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D C RATHOD
-
3.SACHIN MAHESHBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D C RATHOD
-
4.DHARMESHBHAI RAMANBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D C RATHOD
-
5.THAKORBHAI RAMANBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D C RATHOD
-
6.NILESHBHAI SHANABHAI PARMAR
Adv. D C RATHOD
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara granted regular bail to six accused persons in a case involving charges of grievous hurt using an iron pipe and related offences under BNS sections. The court held that while mere apprehension of witness intimidation cannot justify bail denial, suitable conditions could mitigate these concerns, making bail appropriate given the lengthy trial period and risk of pretrial conviction. Each accused was released on personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to stringent conditions including a 6-month restriction from entering Manjusar village and monthly police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
9th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Order
9th Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2026
Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara granted regular bail to six accused persons in a case involving charges of grievous hurt using an iron pipe and related offences under BNS sections. The court held that while mere apprehension of witness intimidation cannot justify bail denial, suitable conditions could mitigate these concerns, making bail appropriate given the lengthy trial period and risk of pretrial conviction. Each accused was released on personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to stringent conditions including a 6-month restriction from entering Manjusar village and monthly police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts