LATE OF MINABEN VIKRAMSINH PARMAR LEGAL HEIRS(Legal Heir) vs S.B.I GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY — 26/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJVD200001882026

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-SAVLI

Judge

2-9th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LATE OF MINABEN VIKRAMSINH PARMAR LEGAL HEIRS(Legal Heir)

    Adv. M P VYAS1.

  2. 2.VIKRAMSINH MANUBHAI PARMAR 1.

  3. 3.MINOR RINKUBEN VIKRAMSINH PARMAR 1.

  4. 4.GANGABEN MANUBHAI PARMRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.B.I GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal ordered disbursement of Rs. 19,74,783 compensation deposited by SBI General Insurance to the legal heirs of deceased Meenaben Vikramsinh Parmar in a 40:40:20 ratio. Of each claimant's share, 30% is paid immediately via NEFT/RTGS while 70% is invested in cumulative fixed deposits for 5 years (renewable until final appeal disposal), with the minor's amount held under her father's guardianship and all deposits retained by the Tribunal's Nazir without loan facility access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    9th Addl District Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal ordered disbursement of Rs. 19,74,783 compensation deposited by SBI General Insurance to the legal heirs of deceased Meenaben Vikramsinh Parmar in a 40:40:20 ratio. Of each claimant's share, 30% is paid immediately via NEFT/RTGS while 70% is invested in cumulative fixed deposits for 5 years (renewable until final appeal disposal), with the minor's amount held under her father's guardianship and all deposits retained by the Tribunal's Nazir without loan facility access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case