LATE VIJAYKUMAR ARVINDBHAI PARMAR(Legal Heir) vs GO DIGIT GENRAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED — 22/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJVD200001792026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

22/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-SAVLI

Judge

2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

05th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166,

Petitioner(s)

LATE VIJAYKUMAR ARVINDBHAI PARMAR(Legal Heir)

Adv. K B SHARMA1.

ARVINDBHAI GABABHAI PARMAR 1.

SAROJBEN ARVINDBHAI PARMAR 1.

MINOR MITESHKUMAR ARVINDBHAI PARMAR

Respondent(s)

GO DIGIT GENRAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: 2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

05-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

05-03-2026
ORDER
05-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Vadodara allowed the heirs of deceased Vijaykumar Parmar to withdraw fixed deposits totaling Rs. 7,28,000 held with State Bank of India for house construction. The tribunal applied Supreme Court guidelines distinguishing literate claimants from minors and illiterates, exercising discretion to permit withdrawal based on the applicants' legitimate need to construct a new house estimated at Rs. 6,58,950, reasoning that denying access would force them to take expensive bank loans. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Vadodara allowed the heirs of deceased Vijaykumar Parmar to withdraw fixed deposits totaling Rs. 7,28,000 held with State Bank of India for house construction. The tribunal applied Supreme Court guidelines distinguishing literate claimants from minors and illiterates, exercising discretion to permit withdrawal based on the applicants' legitimate need to construct a new house estimated at Rs. 6,58,950, reasoning that denying access would force them to take expensive bank loans. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. COURT-SAVLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case