TH E GOVERMENT OF GUJARAT vs JAYANTIBHAI VINUBHAI NAYAK Advocate - NO ADVOCATE — 839/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,511,114,. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJVD190009762017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
839/2017
Filing Date
27-10-2017
Registration No
839/2017
Registration Date
27-10-2017
Court
TALUKA COURT-DESAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TH E GOVERMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAYANTIBHAI VINUBHAI NAYAK Advocate - NO ADVOCATE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Jayantibhai Vinubhai Nayak of theft charges under IPC sections 379, 511, and 114, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the court acknowledged that a theft of electrical pole pieces and gas cutter worth ₹30,000 occurred near Narmada Canal, it determined that the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to establish that the accused specifically committed the crime, as the evidence relied heavily on the investigator's testimony without independent corroboration from neutral witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Jayantibhai Vinubhai Nayak of theft charges under IPC sections 379, 511, and 114, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the court acknowledged that a theft of electrical pole pieces and gas cutter worth ₹30,000 occurred near Narmada Canal, it determined that the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to establish that the accused specifically committed the crime, as the evidence relied heavily on the investigator's testimony without independent corroboration from neutral witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts