THE GOVERMENT OF GUJARAT vs AJITBHAI URFE RANGIT VINUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R H RAUL — 224/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(1),296(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJVD190004582025
Filing Number
224/2025
Filing Date
29-Oct-2025
Registration No
224/2025
Registration Date
29-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-DESAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11197035250477
Police Station
DESAR POLICE STATION - VADODARA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE GOVERMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJITBHAI URFE RANGIT VINUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R H RAUL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. 224/2025 Court Decision: The defendant, Ajitbhai Urfe Rangit Vinubhai Parmar, was acquitted of charges under BNS 2023 Sections 118(1), 296(k), and GP Act 135. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration, the panchas (witnesses) admitted signing documents without knowledge of their contents, and no credible evidence established the defendant assaulted the complainant with a stick causing injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 224/2025
Case Summary: C.C. 224/2025 Court Decision: The defendant, Ajitbhai Urfe Rangit Vinubhai Parmar, was acquitted of charges under BNS 2023 Sections 118(1), 296(k), and GP Act 135. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration, the panchas (witnesses) admitted signing documents without knowledge of their contents, and no credible evidence established the defendant assaulted the complainant with a stick causing injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts