MANOJ KABHAI SOLANKI C/O. RASHTRIYA MAJDOOR UNION vs GEN. MANAGER, GSFC Advocate - PIYUSH DANAK — 7/2018

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33. Status: For Evidence of Applicant/Complainanat. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant/Complainanat Next hearing 28-Jul-2026 this date has passed

COMP-LC - Complaint

CNR: GJVD150019672018

Filing Number

7/2018

Filing Date

13-Dec-2018

Registration No

7/2018

Registration Date

13-Dec-2018

Court

LABOUR COURT, VADODARA

Judge

4-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KABHAI SOLANKI C/O. RASHTRIYA MAJDOOR UNION

    Adv. ATUL KURUP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GEN. MANAGER, GSFC Advocate - PIYUSH DANAK

  2. 2.ADM SHRI, FERTILIZER SCHOOL

Case History

  1. 28-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant/Complainanat

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant/Complainanat

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 11-May-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 10-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  10. 06-May-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 01-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  12. 29-Mar-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  13. 29-Mar-2025

    Notice To Respondents

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 29-Mar-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 18-Sep-2023

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 7/2018 Petitioner: Manoj Kabhai Solanki (Rashtriya Majdoor Union) Respondents: General Manager, GSFC; Administrator, Fertilizer School Outcome: The petition was PARTLY ALLOWED. The court ruled that the Fertilizer School's termination of the petitioner on October 1, 2018, without prior court approval was illegal and in violation of Industrial Disputes Act Section 33(A). The respondent institution was ordered to: (1) reinstate the petitioner to his position; (2) pay 50% of lost wages to dependents; and (3) reimburse Rs. 5,000 in legal costs. The award became effective 30 days from the judgment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 18-Sep-2023

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 21-Aug-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 07-Aug-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 19-Jul-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 28-Jun-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 21-Jun-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 03-May-2023

    For Order

  23. 10-Apr-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 13-Mar-2023

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 06-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 09-Jan-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 05-Dec-2022

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 07-Nov-2022

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 29-Aug-2022

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 27-Jun-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 25-Apr-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 28-Feb-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 06-Dec-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 18-Oct-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  35. 07-Sep-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  36. 03-Aug-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  37. 06-Jul-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  38. 08-Jun-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  39. 05-Apr-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  40. 18-Jan-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  41. 19-Oct-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  42. 20-Jul-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  43. 20-Apr-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  44. 17-Feb-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  45. 27-Jan-2020

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  46. 16-Dec-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  47. 21-Nov-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  48. 03-Oct-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  49. 19-Sep-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  50. 19-Aug-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  51. 22-Jul-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  52. 06-Jul-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  53. 04-May-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  54. 22-Apr-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  55. 18-Apr-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  56. 08-Apr-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  57. 20-Mar-2019

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  58. 06-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 13-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 7/2018 Petitioner: Manoj Kabhai Solanki (Rashtriya Majdoor Union) Respondents: General Manager, GSFC; Administrator, Fertilizer School Outcome: The petition was PARTLY ALLOWED. The court ruled that the Fertilizer School's termination of the petitioner on October 1, 2018, without prior court approval was illegal and in violation of Industrial Disputes Act Section 33(A). The respondent institution was ordered to: (1) reinstate the petitioner to his position; (2) pay 50% of lost wages to dependents; and (3) reimburse Rs. 5,000 in legal costs. The award became effective 30 days from the judgment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case