EAJKUMAR SURENDRABHAI SHAH C/O NEW UNITED EMPLOYEES UNION vs R R CABLE — 64/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th May 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJVD150005422024
Filing Number
64/2024
Filing Date
21-03-2024
Registration No
64/2024
Registration Date
21-03-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, VADODARA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EAJKUMAR SURENDRABHAI SHAH C/O NEW UNITED EMPLOYEES UNION
Respondent(s)
R R CABLE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For Notice Serve to opponent
For Notice Serve to opponent
For Notice Serve to opponent
For Notice Serve to opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | For Notice Serve to opponent |
| 14-03-2026 | For Notice Serve to opponent |
| 20-02-2026 | For Notice Serve to opponent |
| 30-01-2026 | For Notice Serve to opponent |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: REF(LCV) 64/2024 The Labour Court rejected the reference filed by Raj Kumar Surendrabhai Shah (represented by New United Employees Union) against R R Cable regarding reinstatement to his original position. The court found that the respondent/worker failed to submit any claim statement or supporting evidence for his case, and consequently dismissed the reference as devoid of merit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: REF(LCV) 64/2024 The Labour Court rejected the reference filed by Raj Kumar Surendrabhai Shah (represented by New United Employees Union) against R R Cable regarding reinstatement to his original position. The court found that the respondent/worker failed to submit any claim statement or supporting evidence for his case, and consequently dismissed the reference as devoid of merit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts