PATEL BHAVINBHAI NILESHBHAI vs PATEL ROHITBHAI ANTOLBHAI Advocate - S.A.MISHRA — 125/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: FURTHER STATEMENT. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJVD130001642018
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
125/2018
Filing Date
11-04-2018
Registration No
125/2018
Registration Date
11-04-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, SINOR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL BHAVINBHAI NILESHBHAI
Adv. J.S.LUHAR
Respondent(s)
PATEL ROHITBHAI ANTOLBHAI Advocate - S.A.MISHRA
PATEL SHOBHANABEN ROHITBHAI
Adv. S.A.MISHRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court ordered the accused (cheque drawer) to pay interim compensation of 20% of the cheque amount (₹80,000 out of ₹4,00,000) to the complainant within 60 days under Section 143(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981. The court rejected the accused's preliminary objections and directed the case to proceed, with a provision that if the accused is acquitted, the complainant must repay the interim compensation with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court ordered the accused (cheque drawer) to pay interim compensation of 20% of the cheque amount (₹80,000 out of ₹4,00,000) to the complainant within 60 days under Section 143(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981. The court rejected the accused's preliminary objections and directed the case to proceed, with a provision that if the accused is acquitted, the complainant must repay the interim compensation with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts