PATEL BHAYLALBHAI JESANGBHAI vs TALATI KAM MANTRI — 70/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5,9,15,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJVD070024742020

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

14th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

70/2020

Filing Date

10-12-2020

Registration No

70/2020

Registration Date

10-12-2020

Court

TALUKA COURT, DABHOI

Judge

4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 5,9,15,

Petitioner(s)

PATEL BHAYLALBHAI JESANGBHAI

Adv. A.H.MAKRANI

Respondent(s)

TALATI KAM MANTRI

TALUKA VIKAS ADHIKARISHRI

MAMLADAR SHREE

NAYAB COLLECTORSHRI

COLLECTOR SHRI

PATEL JITENDRABHAI RAMANBHAI

PATEL KUNJALBHJAI KANCHANBHAI

PATEL HIMMATBHAI JAVERBHAI

PATEL HARIVADAN VITHALBHAI

PATEL NARANBHAI PRAGJIBHAI

PATEL PARTHIV NARANBHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

05-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

22-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

20-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

19-09-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

30-08-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

30-08-2025
ORDER

Summary The plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (interim order) under CPC 1908, Order 39, Rules 1-2 and Section 151 in RCS No. 70/2020 has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, could not prove irreparable injury, and did not demonstrate that the balance of convenience favored granting the interim relief. The case involves a property dispute in Dharampuri village, Dabhoi, regarding properties numbered 258 and 258/1, with the court determining the plaintiff was not entitled to the temporary injunction sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (interim order) under CPC 1908, Order 39, Rules 1-2 and Section 151 in RCS No. 70/2020 has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, could not prove irreparable injury, and did not demonstrate that the balance of convenience favored granting the interim relief. The case involves a property dispute in Dharampuri village, Dabhoi, regarding properties numbered 258 and 258/1, with the court determining the plaintiff was not entitled to the temporary injunction sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DABHOI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case