HAMISHBHAI G.KANSARA vs KAILASHBEN RAMESHBHAI PATEL Advocate - D B SHAH — 96/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - cri. misc. appli

CNR: GJVD070013042026

Filing Number

96/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

96/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DABHOI

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAMISHBHAI G.KANSARA

    Adv. A H MAKRANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAILASHBEN RAMESHBHAI PATEL Advocate - D B SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA No. 96/2026 Decision: The court rejected the bail application of both accused (Harivdan Gopaldas Kansara and Vaishalibn Hamishbhai Kansara). The court found that the accused have systematically evaded legal proceedings since 2019, repeatedly absented themselves despite multiple summons, and made deliberate efforts to obstruct justice in multiple cheque bounce cases. Given their pattern of non-cooperation with the court and serious risk of further evasion if released on bail, the court deemed them unsuitable for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Order On Urgent Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Order On Urgent Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA No. 96/2026 Decision: The court rejected the bail application of both accused (Harivdan Gopaldas Kansara and Vaishalibn Hamishbhai Kansara). The court found that the accused have systematically evaded legal proceedings since 2019, repeatedly absented themselves despite multiple summons, and made deliberate efforts to obstruct justice in multiple cheque bounce cases. Given their pattern of non-cooperation with the court and serious risk of further evasion if released on bail, the court deemed them unsuitable for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case