RAHULKUMAR RAMSING JATAV vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 53/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - cri. misc. appli

CNR: GJVD070005742026

Filing Number

53/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DABHOI

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,98(2),81,83

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHULKUMAR RAMSING JATAV

    Adv. J R RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of accused Rahulbhai Ramsingh Jatav in a Prohibition Act case (involving alleged illegal liquor trafficking worth ₹33,10,100). The court found the charges serious given the large quantity of foreign liquor involved (over 20 liters), the accused's apparent involvement in organized smuggling, and his coordination with co-accused, making him unsuitable for bail at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Order On Urgent Hearing

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Order On Urgent Hearing

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Order On Urgent Hearing

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of accused Rahulbhai Ramsingh Jatav in a Prohibition Act case (involving alleged illegal liquor trafficking worth ₹33,10,100). The court found the charges serious given the large quantity of foreign liquor involved (over 20 liters), the accused's apparent involvement in organized smuggling, and his coordination with co-accused, making him unsuitable for bail at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case