GROW GREEN AGRO IDUSTRIES PROPWRITER RAMILABEN CHAUDHARI NA P/O/P KAMLESH ARVINDBHAI PATEL vs AEGRI BUISNESSCENTRE NA PROP THAKOR BHAGVANBHAI DEVSIBHAI Advocate - K J BHAVSAR — 63/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJVD070001202026

Filing Number

63/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

63/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DABHOI

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GROW GREEN AGRO IDUSTRIES PROPWRITER RAMILABEN CHAUDHARI NA P/O/P KAMLESH ARVINDBHAI PATEL

    Adv. L J PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AEGRI BUISNESSCENTRE NA PROP THAKOR BHAGVANBHAI DEVSIBHAI Advocate - K J BHAVSAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 63/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dabhoi, acquitted the defendant (Agro Business Centre proprietor) of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding insufficient evidence that the cheque was issued to discharge a debt. However, the defendant was ordered to deposit ₹5,000 as security for six months under the Criminal Procedure Code. Key Reasoning: While the petitioner presented a cheque that was dishonored with "drawer signature differs," during cross-examination the petitioner admitted that the defendant had already paid the cheque amount and no outstanding liability remained. The court held that without proof of an existing legally enforceable debt at the time of cheque issuance, the statutory presumptions under Sections 118-139 of the NI Act could not support conviction. The burden of proof shifted to the accused to rebut the presumption, but the petitioner's own admission negated the essential element of debt/liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 63/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dabhoi, acquitted the defendant (Agro Business Centre proprietor) of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding insufficient evidence that the cheque was issued to discharge a debt. However, the defendant was ordered to deposit ₹5,000 as security for six months under the Criminal Procedure Code. Key Reasoning: While the petitioner presented a cheque that was dishonored with "drawer signature differs," during cross-examination the petitioner admitted that the defendant had already paid the cheque amount and no outstanding liability remained. The court held that without proof of an existing legally enforceable debt at the time of cheque issuance, the statutory presumptions under Sections 118-139 of the NI Act could not support conviction. The burden of proof shifted to the accused to rebut the presumption, but the petitioner's own admission negated the essential element of debt/liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case