GROW GREEN AGRO IDUSTRIES PROPWRITER RAMILABEN CHAUDHARI NA P/O/P KAMLESH ARVINDBHAI PATEL vs AEGRI BUISNESSCENTRE NA PROP THAKOR BHAGVANBHAI DEVSIBHAI Advocate - K J BHAVSAR — 63/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJVD070001202026
Filing Number
63/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DABHOI
Judge
4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GROW GREEN AGRO IDUSTRIES PROPWRITER RAMILABEN CHAUDHARI NA P/O/P KAMLESH ARVINDBHAI PATEL
Adv. L J PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.AEGRI BUISNESSCENTRE NA PROP THAKOR BHAGVANBHAI DEVSIBHAI Advocate - K J BHAVSAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 63/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dabhoi, acquitted the defendant (Agro Business Centre proprietor) of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding insufficient evidence that the cheque was issued to discharge a debt. However, the defendant was ordered to deposit ₹5,000 as security for six months under the Criminal Procedure Code. Key Reasoning: While the petitioner presented a cheque that was dishonored with "drawer signature differs," during cross-examination the petitioner admitted that the defendant had already paid the cheque amount and no outstanding liability remained. The court held that without proof of an existing legally enforceable debt at the time of cheque issuance, the statutory presumptions under Sections 118-139 of the NI Act could not support conviction. The burden of proof shifted to the accused to rebut the presumption, but the petitioner's own admission negated the essential element of debt/liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2026
Summary of Case 63/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dabhoi, acquitted the defendant (Agro Business Centre proprietor) of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding insufficient evidence that the cheque was issued to discharge a debt. However, the defendant was ordered to deposit ₹5,000 as security for six months under the Criminal Procedure Code. Key Reasoning: While the petitioner presented a cheque that was dishonored with "drawer signature differs," during cross-examination the petitioner admitted that the defendant had already paid the cheque amount and no outstanding liability remained. The court held that without proof of an existing legally enforceable debt at the time of cheque issuance, the statutory presumptions under Sections 118-139 of the NI Act could not support conviction. The burden of proof shifted to the accused to rebut the presumption, but the petitioner's own admission negated the essential element of debt/liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts