STATE BANCK OF INADIA MUKESHKUMAR RASULABAD BRANCH vs KHALNTU SHENLU BHILALA — 105/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJVD060025982025

Filing Number

105/2025

Filing Date

20-Sep-2025

Registration No

105/2025

Registration Date

20-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGHODIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANCK OF INADIA MUKESHKUMAR RASULABAD BRANCH

    Adv. K K CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHALNTU SHENLU BHILALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court dismissed State Bank of India's suit against Khalntu Shenlu Bhilala for recovery of a loan amount due to the bank's lack of diligence and interest in pursuing the case. The court noted that despite the defendant's death and multiple opportunities to implead the legal heirs across five adjournments, the bank failed to take any steps and remained consistently absent from proceedings, demonstrating no genuine intent to proceed with the lawsuit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 10-Oct-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 04-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 105/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed State Bank of India's suit against Khalntu Shenlu Bhilala for recovery of a loan amount due to the bank's lack of diligence and interest in pursuing the case. The court noted that despite the defendant's death and multiple opportunities to implead the legal heirs across five adjournments, the bank failed to take any steps and remained consistently absent from proceedings, demonstrating no genuine intent to proceed with the lawsuit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case