State Bank of India vs SHRIRAMBHAI BABUBHAI KATARIYA — 153/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 05th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJVD060024212023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
153/2023
Filing Date
01-07-2023
Registration No
153/2023
Registration Date
01-07-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGHODIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India
Adv. A B PANCHAL
Respondent(s)
SHRIRAMBHAI BABUBHAI KATARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 15-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed State Bank of India's recovery suit against Shrirambhai Babubhai Katariya due to the bank's repeated non-appearance and failure to prosecute the case despite multiple hearing dates. The Principal Civil Judge found that the bank's manager failed to appear for cross-examination and did not submit required reports, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter, warranting dismissal in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed State Bank of India's recovery suit against Shrirambhai Babubhai Katariya due to the bank's repeated non-appearance and failure to prosecute the case despite multiple hearing dates. The Principal Civil Judge found that the bank's manager failed to appear for cross-examination and did not submit required reports, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter, warranting dismissal in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts