State Bank of India vs RAJESHBHAI GANGARAM TADVI — 152/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 05th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJVD060024202023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
152/2023
Filing Date
01-07-2023
Registration No
152/2023
Registration Date
01-07-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGHODIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India
Adv. A B PANCHAL
Respondent(s)
RAJESHBHAI GANGARAM TADVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 15-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the State Bank of India's case against Rajeshbhai Gangaram Tadvi for recovery of dues due to the bank's repeated non-appearance and failure to pursue the matter. Despite multiple adjournments granted and several hearing dates (from August 2025 to March 2026), the bank's manager failed to appear for examination and submitted no reports or documents regarding the case, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the State Bank of India's case against Rajeshbhai Gangaram Tadvi for recovery of dues due to the bank's repeated non-appearance and failure to pursue the matter. Despite multiple adjournments granted and several hearing dates (from August 2025 to March 2026), the bank's manager failed to appear for examination and submitted no reports or documents regarding the case, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts