JAYSWAL RAJESHKUMAR MULJIBHAI vs PATEL HARIKISHOR MAGANBHAI — 24/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJVD060009532025
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
24/2025
Filing Date
19-03-2025
Registration No
24/2025
Registration Date
19-03-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGHODIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYSWAL RAJESHKUMAR MULJIBHAI
Adv. A R BHATT
Respondent(s)
PATEL HARIKISHOR MAGANBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 26-02-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 28-01-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION | |
| 29-12-2025 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION | |
| 04-12-2025 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Principal Civil Judge of Vaghodia rejected the plaintiff's application for interim injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from transferring agricultural land in Vadodara. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as all documentary evidence (agreement to sell, MOU, bank statements, notices) were mere xerox copies lacking authenticity, and the plaintiff withheld material facts including pending government land acquisition proceedings and his lack of farmer status required to purchase agricultural land in Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Principal Civil Judge of Vaghodia rejected the plaintiff's application for interim injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from transferring agricultural land in Vadodara. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as all documentary evidence (agreement to sell, MOU, bank statements, notices) were mere xerox copies lacking authenticity, and the plaintiff withheld material facts including pending government land acquisition proceedings and his lack of farmer status required to purchase agricultural land in Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts