State Bank of India vs DAHYABHAI RAYJIBHAI PATEL — 29/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 05th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJVD060008542024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
29/2024
Filing Date
02-03-2024
Registration No
29/2024
Registration Date
02-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGHODIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India
Adv. A B PANCHAL
Respondent(s)
DAHYABHAI RAYJIBHAI PATEL
RAMESHBHAI RAYJIBHAI PATEL
SANJAYBHAI NAGJIBHAI PATEL
SARASWATIBEN DAHYABHAI PATEL
NIRUBEN DAHYABHAI PATEL
NAYNABEN DAHYABHAI PATEL
VARSHABEN DAHYABHAI PATEL
KALPESHKUMAR DAHYABHAI PATEL
SAROJBEN RAMESHBHAI PATEL
JAYMINABEN RAMESHBHAI PATEL
DHIRAJBHAI RAMESHBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 07-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 10-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 15-11-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed State Bank of India's debt recovery suit against Dahyabhai Rayjibhai Patel due to the bank's repeated failure to appear in court or submit the amended plaint despite multiple opportunities and adjournments granted between September 2025 and March 2026. The court found that the bank's lack of diligence and failure to prosecute the case demonstrated no genuine interest in pursuing the matter, warranting dismissal under principles of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed State Bank of India's debt recovery suit against Dahyabhai Rayjibhai Patel due to the bank's repeated failure to appear in court or submit the amended plaint despite multiple opportunities and adjournments granted between September 2025 and March 2026. The court found that the bank's lack of diligence and failure to prosecute the case demonstrated no genuine interest in pursuing the matter, warranting dismissal under principles of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts