THE STATE vs SEKENDRAKUMAR UMESHVAR MAHATO Advocate - P A RATHOD — 1563/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A)(B),106(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 14th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJVD050021762025
Filing Number
1563/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
1563/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAVLI
Judge
4-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0429
Police Station
SAVLI POLICE STATION- VADODARA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE
Adv. APP, D J RATHOD
Respondent(s)
-
1.SEKENDRAKUMAR UMESHVAR MAHATO Advocate - P A RATHOD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1563/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted respondent Sekendrakumar Umeshvar Mahato of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(a)(b), 106(1) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations. The court held that prosecution failed to establish specific material showing the respondent's involvement in the incident on 20/05/2025 in Savli-Halol road, and scanty evidence could not sustain conviction for causing death through rash/negligent conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1563/2025
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1563/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted respondent Sekendrakumar Umeshvar Mahato of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(a)(b), 106(1) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations. The court held that prosecution failed to establish specific material showing the respondent's involvement in the incident on 20/05/2025 in Savli-Halol road, and scanty evidence could not sustain conviction for causing death through rash/negligent conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts