RAJESHBHAI CHAGANBHAI SOLANKI AND HE IS POA OF NO. 2 TO 11 vs PARMAR JUGIBEN BHIKHABHAI Advocate - S.C.RANA — 59/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 30,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJVD050019042018
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
59/2018
Filing Date
14-09-2018
Registration No
59/2018
Registration Date
14-09-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAVLI
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESHBHAI CHAGANBHAI SOLANKI AND HE IS POA OF NO. 2 TO 11
Adv. D.L.DAVE
JADABEN WD/O BABUBHAI DHULABHAI SOLANKI
RAMESHBHAI BABUBHAI SOLANKI
KASHIBEN WD/O. LATE CHHAGANBHAI (RAYJIBHAI) DHULABHAI SOLANKI
MAHENDRABHAI CHHAGANBHAI SOLANKI(Legal Heir) 5.
SUMITRABEN MAHENDRABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. P D DAVE5.
PRIYANKABEN MAHENDRABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. P D DAVE5.
HETALBEN MAHENDRABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. P D DAVE5.
RUTVIK MAHENDRABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. P D DAVE5.
VAISHALIBEN MAHENDRABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. P D DAVE
JAGDISHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI SOLANKI
SHANTABEN WD/O SHANABHAI DHULABHAI SOLANKI
RANGITBHAI SHANABHAI SOLANKI
VIJAYBHAI SHANABHAI SOLANKI
MINAXIBEN SHANABHAI SOLANKI
SAJIBEN D/O LATE LAKHIBEN DHULABHAI SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
PARMAR JUGIBEN BHIKHABHAI Advocate - S.C.RANA
PARMAR VIMLABEN BHIKHABHAI
Adv. S.C.RANA
Patel Yogeshbhai Chotabhai
Adv. S.M.SAIYED
Sadiya Mahamadbhai IBRAHIMBHAI
Adv. S.M.SAIYED
Rana Ibrahimbhai RAYSING
Adv. S.M.SAIYED
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 08-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court's order partially allows the plaintiffs' petition. The court granted the plaintiffs' interim prayer and mandated that defendants No. 4 and 5 must not sell, mortgage, or transfer the disputed agricultural land in Lasundra, Savli, Vadodara, or alter its character in any manner. The court found that the plaintiffs lack legal ownership or rights in the property as current defendants possess valid sale documents, and dismissed the plaintiffs' main claim while imposing restrictions to maintain status quo pending final resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court's order partially allows the plaintiffs' petition. The court granted the plaintiffs' interim prayer and mandated that defendants No. 4 and 5 must not sell, mortgage, or transfer the disputed agricultural land in Lasundra, Savli, Vadodara, or alter its character in any manner. The court found that the plaintiffs lack legal ownership or rights in the property as current defendants possess valid sale documents, and dismissed the plaintiffs' main claim while imposing restrictions to maintain status quo pending final resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts