RAY PIYUSH CHIMANBHAI vs VIJAYKUMAR NARVATSINH CHAVDA — 228/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIM. MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJVD050017492025

Filing Number

228/2025

Filing Date

26-Aug-2025

Registration No

228/2025

Registration Date

26-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAVLI

Judge

4-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAY PIYUSH CHIMANBHAI

    Adv. G A CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYKUMAR NARVATSINH CHAVDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CR.M.A. No. 228/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Savli allowed the delay condonation application, condoning the 10-day delay in filing the Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint. The court registered the case as a criminal case and ordered process to be issued against the accused. Key Reasoning: The court found the complainant's reasons—non-receipt of postal acknowledgment and engagement in agricultural work—constituted sufficient cause under the Limitation Act. Following Supreme Court precedents establishing a liberal approach to delay condonation, the court prioritized substantial justice over technical procedural requirements, particularly given that the accused had not responded to the statutory demand notice and the delay caused no prejudice to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing P.P.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing P.P.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing P.P.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Hearing P.P.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Hearing P.P.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 26-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR.M.A. No. 228/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Savli allowed the delay condonation application, condoning the 10-day delay in filing the Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint. The court registered the case as a criminal case and ordered process to be issued against the accused. Key Reasoning: The court found the complainant's reasons—non-receipt of postal acknowledgment and engagement in agricultural work—constituted sufficient cause under the Limitation Act. Following Supreme Court precedents establishing a liberal approach to delay condonation, the court prioritized substantial justice over technical procedural requirements, particularly given that the accused had not responded to the statutory demand notice and the delay caused no prejudice to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case