YOGESHSINH CHAUHAN vs THE STATE Advocate - APP — 116/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480,117(2),118(2),296(B),115(2),54. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIM. MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJVD050008192026
Filing Number
116/2026
Filing Date
14-Mar-2026
Registration No
116/2026
Registration Date
14-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAVLI
Judge
4-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
260177
Police Station
SAVLI POLICE STATION- VADODARA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YOGESHSINH CHAUHAN
Adv. A R GOSWAMI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
-
2.YASHRAJSINH PARMAR
Adv. A R GOSWAMI
-
3.JITENDRASINH PARMAR
Adv. A R GOSWAMI
-
4.GOPALSINH PARMAR
Adv. A R GOSWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court rejected the bail application filed by accused Yogeshsinh Chauhan in a case involving charges under IPC sections 117(2), 118(2), 296(b), 115(2), 54 and GP Act section 135 for allegedly assaulting multiple victims with weapons. The court found that a prima facie case for the serious charges was established and that releasing the accused on bail would pose a risk to the investigation and potential witness intimidation, making denial of bail justified under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 116/2026
The court rejected the bail application filed by accused Yogeshsinh Chauhan in a case involving charges under IPC sections 117(2), 118(2), 296(b), 115(2), 54 and GP Act section 135 for allegedly assaulting multiple victims with weapons. The court found that a prima facie case for the serious charges was established and that releasing the accused on bail would pose a risk to the investigation and potential witness intimidation, making denial of bail justified under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts