GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RANJNABEN PRABHATBHAI PUNJABHAI THAKOR Advocate - G K PARMAR — 2610/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJVD040037982025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2610/2025
Filing Date
03-10-2025
Registration No
2610/2025
Registration Date
03-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RANJNABEN PRABHATBHAI PUNJABHAI THAKOR Advocate - G K PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 08-12-2025 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 20-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 03-10-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 2610/2025, 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padra, Vadodara Decision: The court acquitted the accused under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(f), finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the seized liquor lacked FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) testing confirmation, witness testimonies were inconsistent regarding the seizure vehicle details and timing, and the accused's alleged possession of the contraband was not conclusively proven through reliable documentary or physical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 2610/2025, 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padra, Vadodara Decision: The court acquitted the accused under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(f), finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the seized liquor lacked FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) testing confirmation, witness testimonies were inconsistent regarding the seizure vehicle details and timing, and the accused's alleged possession of the contraband was not conclusively proven through reliable documentary or physical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts