GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs LALITABEN W.O. BHIKHABHAI MANGALBHAI MALI Advocate - H R PARMAR — 2464/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJVD040036182025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2464/2025
Filing Date
19-09-2025
Registration No
2464/2025
Registration Date
19-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LALITABEN W.O. BHIKHABHAI MANGALBHAI MALI Advocate - H R PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 04-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 21-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 06-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Padra (Gujarat) acquitted the accused in a case under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was in illegal possession of liquor (0.3 liters worth ₹600). Critical gaps in evidence—including missing FSL reports, lack of documentary proof of seizure, and weak witness testimony—created reasonable doubt favoring the accused, who was consequently acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Padra (Gujarat) acquitted the accused in a case under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was in illegal possession of liquor (0.3 liters worth ₹600). Critical gaps in evidence—including missing FSL reports, lack of documentary proof of seizure, and weak witness testimony—created reasonable doubt favoring the accused, who was consequently acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts