GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SANGITABEN DINESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI TARBADA — 2319/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJVD040034382025

Filing Number

2319/2025

Filing Date

10-Sep-2025

Registration No

2319/2025

Registration Date

10-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PADRA

Judge

4-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGITABEN DINESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI TARBADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Padra acquitted the accused (Sangitaben Dineshbhai Taribeda) under the Prohibition Act Sections 65(f) and 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that crucial evidence, including the FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report on the seized contraband and proper documentation of the seizure and custody chain, was missing. The absence of corroborating witness testimony and documentary support rendered the prosecution's case insufficient to establish guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2319/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Padra acquitted the accused (Sangitaben Dineshbhai Taribeda) under the Prohibition Act Sections 65(f) and 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that crucial evidence, including the FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report on the seized contraband and proper documentation of the seizure and custody chain, was missing. The absence of corroborating witness testimony and documentary support rendered the prosecution's case insufficient to establish guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case