GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MEENABEN LAKSHMANBHAI VAGHRI — 2315/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJVD040034342025

Filing Number

2315/2025

Filing Date

10-Sep-2025

Registration No

2315/2025

Registration Date

10-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PADRA

Judge

4-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEENABEN LAKSHMANBHAI VAGHRI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padra acquitted the accused (Minaben Lakshmanbhai Waghari) of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding the prosecution's case insufficient. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged recovery of illicit liquor with unimpeachable evidence and lacked corroborating documentary support (FSL report), warranting acquittal and benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2315/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padra acquitted the accused (Minaben Lakshmanbhai Waghari) of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding the prosecution's case insufficient. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged recovery of illicit liquor with unimpeachable evidence and lacked corroborating documentary support (FSL report), warranting acquittal and benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case