GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs JASHIBEN URFE JASHODABEN W.O. LAKSHMANBHAI DABHAIBHAI VAGHRI Advocate - G K PARMAR — 2172/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJVD040032262025

Filing Number

2172/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

2172/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PADRA

Judge

4-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JASHIBEN URFE JASHODABEN W.O. LAKSHMANBHAI DABHAIBHAI VAGHRI Advocate - G K PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padra acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65(A)(A)) due to insufficient and unreliable evidence. The court found that the prosecution's witnesses were not credible, the seizure of alleged illicit liquor lacked proper documentation (no FSL report), and the seizure panchnama was inadequately supported by credible evidence, warranting benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 17-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 25-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2172/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padra acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65(A)(A)) due to insufficient and unreliable evidence. The court found that the prosecution's witnesses were not credible, the seizure of alleged illicit liquor lacked proper documentation (no FSL report), and the seizure panchnama was inadequately supported by credible evidence, warranting benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case