GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs REKHABEN W.O. RAMESHBHAI LALLUBHAI MALI Advocate - M D MAKWANA — 1723/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJVD040026562025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1723/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
1723/2025
Registration Date
17-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
REKHABEN W.O. RAMESHBHAI LALLUBHAI MALI Advocate - M D MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 04-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 22-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 02-12-2025 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Padra acquitted the accused (Rekhaben Rameshbhai Malo) of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's case was based solely on an uncorroborated police witness statement, FSL testing was not conducted on alleged seized liquor, and critical evidentiary gaps existed regarding the seizure and ownership of the alleged contraband, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Padra acquitted the accused (Rekhaben Rameshbhai Malo) of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's case was based solely on an uncorroborated police witness statement, FSL testing was not conducted on alleged seized liquor, and critical evidentiary gaps existed regarding the seizure and ownership of the alleged contraband, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts