GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SABUBEN W.O. GOPALBHAI MOTIBHAI MALI Advocate - M D MAKWANA — 1348/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJVD040021952025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1348/2025

Filing Date

13-06-2025

Registration No

1348/2025

Registration Date

13-06-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PADRA

Judge

4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

05th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SABUBEN W.O. GOPALBHAI MOTIBHAI MALI Advocate - M D MAKWANA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

05-03-2026

Disposed

20-12-2025

JUDGEMENT

06-11-2025

FURTHER STATEMENT

26-08-2025

FURTHER STATEMENT

29-07-2025

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

05-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Summary Case No. 1348/2025 | 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padra | Decision: 05.03.2026 The court acquitted the accused (Sabuben Gopalabhai Malo) of charges under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentness gaps including lack of FSL report on seized liquor, insufficient witness corroboration, and failure to prove the accused's ownership or possession of the contraband material. Consequently, the accused was granted bail release with conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary Case No. 1348/2025 | 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Padra | Decision: 05.03.2026 The court acquitted the accused (Sabuben Gopalabhai Malo) of charges under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentness gaps including lack of FSL report on seized liquor, insufficient witness corroboration, and failure to prove the accused's ownership or possession of the contraband material. Consequently, the accused was granted bail release with conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, PADRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case