HAIRS OF MANGALBHAI MADHABHAI BHIMABHAI PADHIYAR 1. PADHIYAR PUNJIBEN MANGALBHAI vs PADHIYAR MELABHAI CHHATRASANG Advocate - N S MALEK — 64/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 38. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJVD040020762017
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
64/2017
Filing Date
28-08-2017
Registration No
64/2017
Registration Date
28-08-2017
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAIRS OF MANGALBHAI MADHABHAI BHIMABHAI PADHIYAR 1. PADHIYAR PUNJIBEN MANGALBHAI
Adv. S S PATEL
PADHIYAR NATUBHAI MANGALBHAI
Adv. S S PATEL
PADHIYAR KAPILABEN MANGALBHAI
Adv. S S PATEL
PADHIYAR KANTIBHAI MAGALBHAI
Adv. S S PATEL
PADHIYAR ARVINDBHAI MANGALBHAI
Adv. S S PATEL
Respondent(s)
PADHIYAR MELABHAI CHHATRASANG Advocate - N S MALEK
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 05-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 22-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 20-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary Petition Dismissed: The court rejected the plaintiffs' appeal for a mandatory injunction to prevent the defendant from cultivating jointly-held agricultural land in Padra, Vadodara. The judge found that both parties held equal rights to the shared property and rejected the plaintiffs' claim of being the first-instance case owners, thus denying the requested relief and ordering the appeal to be dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Petition Dismissed: The court rejected the plaintiffs' appeal for a mandatory injunction to prevent the defendant from cultivating jointly-held agricultural land in Padra, Vadodara. The judge found that both parties held equal rights to the shared property and rejected the plaintiffs' claim of being the first-instance case owners, thus denying the requested relief and ordering the appeal to be dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts