MUKESHBHAI MELSANGBHAI PADHIYAR vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 77/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJVD040009002026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
77/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
77/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUKESHBHAI MELSANGBHAI PADHIYAR
Adv. H R PARMAR
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gujarat High Court (CRMA J/77/2026) granted bail to the accused in criminal case no. 231/2026 under IPC sections 145, 3, 181, 177, and Prohibition Act section 66(1)(b), finding the accused to be of sound financial standing and considering the nature of charges. The court ordered the accused's release on furnishing a cash bond of Rs. 10,000 and an equal amount surety, deeming bail appropriate given the established legal principles for bail determination and the accused's special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court (CRMA J/77/2026) granted bail to the accused in criminal case no. 231/2026 under IPC sections 145, 3, 181, 177, and Prohibition Act section 66(1)(b), finding the accused to be of sound financial standing and considering the nature of charges. The court ordered the accused's release on furnishing a cash bond of Rs. 10,000 and an equal amount surety, deeming bail appropriate given the established legal principles for bail determination and the accused's special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts