SHEKH RUBINKHAN YUSUFMIYA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 75/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJVD040008972026

Filing Number

75/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PADRA

Judge

4-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHEKH RUBINKHAN YUSUFMIYA

    Adv. V H PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary In this CRMA case from the Gujarat High Court (dated March 7, 2026), the court granted bail to accused Shekh Rubinkhan Yusufmiya in a drug-related case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and BNS sections 336(2)(4), 338, 339, and 340(2). The court found that while the arrest procedure was legally valid, the evidence against the accused was weak—relying solely on an uncorroborated police statement from a co-accused. The court noted no direct evidence linked the appellant to the contraband, no incriminating documents were recovered from him, and the trial would take considerable time, warranting bail with conditions including court appearance, passport surrender, and restrictions on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In this CRMA case from the Gujarat High Court (dated March 7, 2026), the court granted bail to accused Shekh Rubinkhan Yusufmiya in a drug-related case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and BNS sections 336(2)(4), 338, 339, and 340(2). The court found that while the arrest procedure was legally valid, the evidence against the accused was weak—relying solely on an uncorroborated police statement from a co-accused. The court noted no direct evidence linked the appellant to the contraband, no incriminating documents were recovered from him, and the trial would take considerable time, warranting bail with conditions including court appearance, passport surrender, and restrictions on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case