PARMAR SANJAYKUMAR NATVARBHAI vs DAMOR VIKRAMBHAI BHARATBHAI — 7/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJVD040005502026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARMAR SANJAYKUMAR NATVARBHAI
Adv. N A CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
DAMOR VIKRAMBHAI BHARATBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court ordered registration of a criminal case against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 on the basis that the complainant sold a desktop to the accused for ₹6.5 lakhs, received partial payment of ₹3.5 lakhs, and the remaining ₹3 lakhs were to be paid by cheque dated 10/11/2025, which was later dishonored with "FUND INSUFFICIENT" status on 12/12/2025. The court directed issuance of summons to the accused and directed further inquiry as per Criminal Procedure Code Section 204, finding prima facie evidence of cheque bounce offense under NI Act Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court ordered registration of a criminal case against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 on the basis that the complainant sold a desktop to the accused for ₹6.5 lakhs, received partial payment of ₹3.5 lakhs, and the remaining ₹3 lakhs were to be paid by cheque dated 10/11/2025, which was later dishonored with "FUND INSUFFICIENT" status on 12/12/2025. The court directed issuance of summons to the accused and directed further inquiry as per Criminal Procedure Code Section 204, finding prima facie evidence of cheque bounce offense under NI Act Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts