EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MR. SHAIKH MOHMAD SOHEL vs SUREKHABEN VISHNUBHAI PARMAR — 51/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJVD040005302026
Filing Number
51/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
51/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 10-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MR. SHAIKH MOHMAD SOHEL
Adv. U Y MEHTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUREKHABEN VISHNUBHAI PARMAR
-
2.VISHNUBHAI SURESHBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Padra allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of a secured residential property (868 sq.ft.) in Ganpatpura, Vadodara, mortgaged by borrowers Surekhaben and Vishnubhai Parmar. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession after the borrowers failed to comply with the legal notice served under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, noting that the secured creditor had fulfilled all statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 51/2026
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Padra allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of a secured residential property (868 sq.ft.) in Ganpatpura, Vadodara, mortgaged by borrowers Surekhaben and Vishnubhai Parmar. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession after the borrowers failed to comply with the legal notice served under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, noting that the secured creditor had fulfilled all statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts