AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MR. MUKESH KUMAR MATHUR vs SANJAYBHAI MANUBHAI PATEL — 49/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJVD040004922026
Filing Number
49/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
49/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 10-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MR. MUKESH KUMAR MATHUR
Adv. K D VARIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI MANUBHAI PATEL
-
2.SHITALBEN SANJAYBHAI PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Mar-2026
Order
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Padra allowed Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property in Narayan Park, Padra after the borrowers defaulted on their housing loan despite legal notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 30 days and directed the lender to deposit ₹20,000 as the commissioner's remuneration, relying on Supreme Court precedent that CJMs are competent to grant such relief without mandatory hearing of the borrower. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2026
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Padra allowed Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property in Narayan Park, Padra after the borrowers defaulted on their housing loan despite legal notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 30 days and directed the lender to deposit ₹20,000 as the commissioner's remuneration, relying on Supreme Court precedent that CJMs are competent to grant such relief without mandatory hearing of the borrower. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts