CENT BANK HOME FINANCE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MS. PAYAL S. DESAI vs MR. SANDIPKUMAR GOPALBHAI PATEL — 38/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJVD040003342026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
38/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CENT BANK HOME FINANCE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MS. PAYAL S. DESAI
Adv. A T VARDHANI
Respondent(s)
MR. SANDIPKUMAR GOPALBHAI PATEL
MRS. URMILABEN SANDIPKUMAR PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-02-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 06-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Padra allowed Cent Bank Home Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. 102, Krishna Vatika, Vadodara) from the borrowers who defaulted on their home loan despite receiving a legal notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 30 days, with the bank required to deposit ₹20,000 as the Commissioner's remuneration and bear all associated costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Padra allowed Cent Bank Home Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. 102, Krishna Vatika, Vadodara) from the borrowers who defaulted on their home loan despite receiving a legal notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 30 days, with the bank required to deposit ₹20,000 as the Commissioner's remuneration and bear all associated costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts