CENT BANK HOME FINANCE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MS. PAYAL S. DESAI vs MR. SANDIPKUMAR GOPALBHAI PATEL — 38/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJVD040003342026
Filing Number
38/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 10-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CENT BANK HOME FINANCE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MS. PAYAL S. DESAI
Adv. A T VARDHANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR. SANDIPKUMAR GOPALBHAI PATEL
-
2.MRS. URMILABEN SANDIPKUMAR PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Padra allowed Cent Bank Home Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. 102, Krishna Vatika, Vadodara) from the borrowers who defaulted on their home loan despite receiving a legal notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 30 days, with the bank required to deposit ₹20,000 as the Commissioner's remuneration and bear all associated costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Feb-2026
Order/Judgement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2026
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Padra allowed Cent Bank Home Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. 102, Krishna Vatika, Vadodara) from the borrowers who defaulted on their home loan despite receiving a legal notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 30 days, with the bank required to deposit ₹20,000 as the Commissioner's remuneration and bear all associated costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts