ARVINDBHAI MANIBHAI PATEL vs VIJANAND HIRABHAI SAGAR Advocate - B.S.JOSHI — 47/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,038. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJVD040000622015
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
47/2015
Filing Date
13-03-2015
Registration No
47/2015
Registration Date
13-03-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADRA
Judge
1-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARVINDBHAI MANIBHAI PATEL
Adv. A B KACHHIAPATEL
PRAVINBHAI MANIBHAI PATEL
Adv. A B KACHHIAPATEL
NANUBHAI MANIBHAI PATEL
Adv. A B KACHHIAPATEL
ASHOKBHAI MANIBHAI PATEL
Adv. A B KACHHIAPATEL
Respondent(s)
VIJANAND HIRABHAI SAGAR Advocate - B.S.JOSHI
AJIT VEJANAND SAGAR
Adv. B.S.JOSHI
NILESH VEJANAND SAGAR
Adv. B.S.JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 20-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 04-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 13-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 17-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition (R.C.S. No. 21/2014) regarding a property dispute. The court directed that the property sale deed be cancelled and that the plaintiff's name be registered as a joint owner along with the defendants' sons as legal heirs. Additionally, the court ordered that the defendants make genuine efforts to restore the plaintiff's ownership rights to the disputed property, with future court proceedings to bind all parties named in the property revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition (R.C.S. No. 21/2014) regarding a property dispute. The court directed that the property sale deed be cancelled and that the plaintiff's name be registered as a joint owner along with the defendants' sons as legal heirs. Additionally, the court ordered that the defendants make genuine efforts to restore the plaintiff's ownership rights to the disputed property, with future court proceedings to bind all parties named in the property revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts